|
3#

楼主 |
发表于 2005-8-29 21:00:12
|
只看该作者
17. According to survivors, at 2300 hours on July 27, Mr. Good revealed to The Mairi Maru’s Captain that he had brought on board a small explosive device. He threatened to detonate the device if the Captain and crew did not surrender control of the ship. Aware that Raglanian pirates did not generally harm their victims, and in order to minimize the loss of life, the Captain agreed. He ordered his entire crew, most of whom were asleep or below-deck at the time, into the ship's galley. Mr. Good and his assistants locked the crew in the galley and assumed control over The Mairi Maru.
<br>
<br>18. Based upon reports from the crew and evidence left behind, it appears that Mr. Good navigated the ship to a predetermined rendezvous location, where he met with confederates. Mr. Good and his colleagues removed all the technical navigation and communication equipment from The Mairi Maru, as well as the ship's safe. They then disabled The Mairi Maru's aft propeller shaft, making it impossible to safely steer the ship under its own power. They did not disturb the MOX, which was contained in a locked hold. Mr. Good and the other attackers then disembarked, leaving The Mairi Maru to drift on a south-easterly course toward international waters.
<br>
<br>19. On July 28, an intense storm altered the course of the powerless Mairi Maru, which ran aground on one of the partially-submerged sandbars in the Norton Shallows. Damage to the ship's hulls ruptured the secure compartment holding the MOX canisters, several of which were also damaged. The canisters leaked over fifty kilograms of highly radioactive MOX pellets directly onto the sandbar and into the surrounding waters.
<br>
<br>20. In the hours following the crash, members of the crew were able to free themselves from the galley. On July 29, a patrol boat of the Raglanian Royal Navy was conducting training near the sandbar. The crew spotted the grounded ship and approached The Mairi Maru to offer assistance. As they approached, crew members noted a large number of dead fish and sea birds in the vicinity. Freed from the galley, the Captain of The Mairi Maru reported the leaking radioactive materials to the commander of the patrol vessel. The commander immediately ordered his vessel to retreat a safe distance and radioed Raglanian Royal Navy headquarters. Naval reports indicate that several members of crew of The Mairi Maru were dead, and others were exhibiting signs of acute radiation syndrome. The patrol boat radioed for a medical support vessel, which arrived within the hour. Royal Navy doctors rescued and sequestered the surviving crew of The Mairi Maru, and recovered and quarantined the bodies of the dead.
<br>
<br>21. On July 31, 2002, Raglanian Prime Minister Price sent a diplomatic message to Judith Stark, the President of Appollonia. He announced that the Raglanian Royal Navy had confirmed the presence of radioactive materials and hundreds of dead fish and sea birds in the area surrounding the sandbar up to 15 kilometers from the site of the wreck of The Mairi Maru. Mr. Price stated:
<br>The radioactive material that is leaking from the Appollonian ship will not stay in the vicinity for long. Because we are entering the rainy season, strong storms will soon spread the contamination across a wide area. Therefore, Raglan has no choice but to quickly isolate the radioactive danger and, to the extent possible, to clean up the area surrounding the sandbar. The entire region, which is vital to our thriving tourism industry, is already heavily damaged. Furthermore, shifting winds and ocean currents will likely spread the contamination to inhabited Raglanian islands over the next several weeks.
<br>
<br>
<br>22. Mr. Price concluded the message by blaming Appollonia for the damage to the site:
<br>Appollonia caused MOX to be shipped through Raglan's archipelagic waters without any notice to our authorities. Given the well-known dangers of such shipments, had we known in advance of Appollonia's plans, Raglan would have either denied The Mairi Maru access to Raglanian waters or provided, in addition to the pilot, armed naval escort vessels to ensure its safe passage through the Raglanian Archipelago. Appollonia must therefore pay for the cleanup of the sandbar and the surrounding waters. Appollonia must also compensate us for the resulting financial losses suffered by our tourism and sport fishing industries.
<br>
<br>23. On August 2, President Stark responded by diplomatic note, asserting that her government had fully met its obligations concerning the radioactive materials aboard The Mairi Maru. She placed the responsibility for the damage squarely with Raglan, stating: "It is Raglan that bears the responsibility for the crash and its consequences. An agent of the Raglanian government orchestrated the boarding of The Mairi Maru, disabled it, and set it adrift."
<br>
<br>24. On August 4, Prime Minister Price sent another diplomatic note to President Stark, indicating that Raglan had determined to scuttle The Mairi Maru. It read, in relevant part:
<br>With every passing day, more noxious material leaks into the open waters. Cleanup is impossible in a short time-span. Our only choice is to put this material on the deep ocean floor, out of the reach of winds and currents, where it will not present a continuing danger.
<br>
<br>Later that week, a destroyer, acting under the direct order of Prime Minister Price, towed The Mairi Maru less than a kilometer to the southeast and scuttled it. The Mairi Maru sank to a depth of over 9000 meters, to the bottom of the Sand Deep. After the ship was scuttled, Prime Minister Price sent a note to President Stark notifying her of the action.
<br>
<br>25. President Stark held a press conference the next day, explaining the situation to her people, and denouncing Raglan's treatment of the incident. In answer to a question from a reporter, she said:
<br>We hold Raglan responsible for the attack on The Mairi Maru. Raglan's inadequacy in policing its waters for pirates, and its negligence in screening the civilian pilots in its so-called anti-pirate program, make it liable as a matter of international law for the loss of the vessel and her cargo, and the deaths and injuries of her crew. I call upon the government of Raglan to pay compensation to the crew members injured by this accident, to the families of those killed, as well as to the owners of the ship The Mairi Maru.
<br>
<br>26. The Appollonian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mrs. Ernestine Navorocki, sent a diplomatic email message to her counterpart in Raglan. The subject line read, "London Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution." The note said, in relevant part:
<br>The owners and insurers of The Mairi Maru have suffered direct and substantial financial losses as a result of Raglan's choice, freely made, to scuttle this vessel. Raglan must compensate these Appollonian citizens for their losses. Although Appollonia is not a party to the London Convention, we also note with grave concern that the scuttling of The Mairi Maru with cargo aboard violates Raglan's obligations under that Convention. This violation precludes your government from justifying its actions as lawful.
<br>
<br>27. On August 11, Prime Minister Price delivered his government's response, contending that Appollonia was at fault by shipping hazardous materials in violation of applicable international law. He stated that, "Raglan condemns the attack, and strongly denies any responsibility for it. The responsible parties were not acting with the authority of Raglan, which has invested considerable effort and resources to combat maritime hijackings throughout its territory and its seas."
<br>
<br>28. In the same response, Prime Minister Price accused Appollonia of violating its duties as an exporter of nuclear materials:
<br>Appollonia is a member of the IAEA, which requires members who choose to transport nuclear materials through other states' territories to notify those states and to obtain their prior consent. Appollonia has done neither. In case I have not made myself clear, we demand that Appollonia cease shipping MOX through Raglan's archipelagic waters immediately, and we make this demand without prejudice to our claims with respect to The Mairi Maru and her cargo and crew.
<br>
<br>29. Following the Prime Minister's remarks, the Foreign Ministry of Appollonia sent a cable to its counterpart in Raglan, which stated in relevant part:
<br>Appollonia has not breached any of its obligations under the Non-Proliferation Treaty or under the IAEA regime. However, even if we had breached these obligations, your country is not a member of the IAEA and so is without standing to raise these issues. Furthermore, your government was aware that MOX had been transported through your territory in the past, and has never objected. In such circumstances, Appollonia owes Raglan no duties under these treaties. Furthermore, the harm you allege occurred outside of Raglan's territorial waters. No state is responsible for hypothetical or remote damages under international law, whether or not its actions were lawful.
<br>
<br>30. On October 28, 2002, the owners and insurers of The Mairi Maru initiated a civil lawsuit against the government of Raglan in a Raglanian civil court for compensation for the loss of The Mairi Maru. All of the plaintiffs were corporations registered and headquartered in Appollonia. The suit claimed the local equivalent of 15 million Euro for the loss of the ship. The trial court dismissed the action, relying upon the judicial immunity traditionally enjoyed by the Raglanian armed forces in actions seeking money damages for actions taken as part of national defense activities. The decision was upheld by the Supreme Court of Raglan, and no further appeal was available.
<br>
<br>31. On November 1, 2002, the surviving Mairi Maru crew members and the families of those who had died also filed a lawsuit against Raglan in a Raglanian civil court, alleging negligence in Raglan's failed efforts to protect The Mairi Maru while it was in Raglanian archipelagic waters. All the plaintiffs were citizens and residents of Appollonia. The trial court dismissed the action on the same theory of judicial immunity as the insurers' and owners' suit. The plaintiffs appealed to the Raglanian civil court of last resort, which summarily affirmed the trial court's determination.
<br>
<br>32. On April 5, 2003, the President of Appollonia signed into law a legislative enactment entitled "The Commemoration of The Mairi Maru Act of 2003 (COMMA)." The Preamble to COMMA recited the events surrounding the attack and scuttling of The Mairi Maru and alluded to "Raglan's unwillingness to assume its legal responsibility for the attack on the ship, or to compensate Appollonia's citizens for their economic and personal losses." The Act cancelled all student exchange programs between Appollonia and Raglan, and suspended the issuance of new student visas to Raglanian citizens seeking to study in Appollonia. On May 28, 2003, Prime Minister Price announced that he was withdrawing Raglan's national football team from the Olympic qualifier tournament, scheduled to be held in Appollonia in February 2004.
<br>
<br>33. On July 1, 2003, the plenary session of the Regional Organisation of Nations (RON), an intergovernmental assembly of which both Appollonia and Raglan are members, adopted a non-binding resolution, calling upon Appollonia and Raglan to resolve their differences and end the dispute. Shortly thereafter, President Stark and Prime Minister Price agreed to bring this case before the International Court of Justice. Maguffin has declined to participate, its Justice Ministry asserting that it has no stake in the outcome.
<br>
<br>34. The Raglanian government estimates that it will take five years to decontaminate the area affected by radioactive materials spilled from The Mairi Maru. The process will cost the government of Raglan approximately 160 million Euro. During those five years, the area will be completely unusable for tourism or sport fishing, and the Raglanian tourism industry will lose approximately 100 million Euro. Appollonia does not dispute these figures.
<br>
<br>35. Appollonia and Raglan are both members of the United Nations. Appollonia is a member of the IAEA, but Raglan is not. In addition, Appollonia and Raglan are parties to the following treaties, as indicated:
<br> Instrument Appollonia Raglan
<br> Charter of the United Nations ratified 1 Jun 63 ratified 5 Aug 71
<br> Statute of the International Court
<br> of Justice ratified 1 Jun 63 ratified 5 Aug 71
<br>Treaty on the Non-Proliferation ratified 1 Mar 85 No
<br> of Nuclear Weapons (1968)
<br> Vienna Convention on the Law ratified 3 Nov 77 ratified 6 Jan 80
<br> of Treaties (1969)
<br> United Nations Convention on No ratified 1 Jun 88
<br> The Law of the Sea (1982),
<br> including Part XI
<br> Convention on the Territorial ratified 1 Feb 68 No
<br> Sea and the Contiguous Zone (1958)
<br> Convention on the High Seas (1958) ratified 1 Feb 68 No
<br>Convention on the Physical ratified 30 Jun 95 No
<br> Protection of Nuclear
<br>Materials (1980)
<br>Basel Convention on the Control of No ratified 5 May 90
<br>TranS*oundary Movements of
<br>Hazardous Wastes and their
<br>Disposal (1989)
<br>London Convention on the No ratified 31 May 90
<br>Prevention of Marine Pollution
<br>by Dumping of Wastes and Other
<br>Matter (1972)
<br>
<br>Neither Raglan nor Appollonia has signed or ratified any other relevant instruments.
<br>
<br>36. The parties have agreed that, following the determination of their respective rights and liabilities, if any, the calculation of any damages will be assigned to a special master to be named later.
<br>
<br>37. Appollonia respectfully requests that the ICJ adjudge and declare:
<br>(a) Raglan is responsible for the attack upon and wreck of The Mairi Maru and all consequences thereof by virtue of (1) its failure to respond appropriately to pirate activities in its archipelagic waters and (2) the acts of Thomas Good, which are imputable to Raglan;
<br>(b) Raglan is responsible for the loss of The Mairi Maru and the MOX and other cargo that she carried, because its scuttling of the vessel was illegal, and therefore owes compensation to Appollonia on behalf of its citizens who suffered direct financial and other losses;
<br> |
|