政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 391|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

转帖:中国人民大学国际政治专业博士点主文献

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2010-12-17 12:28:49 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
论 文



1. Donald Kagan, “In Defense of History” (2005 Jefferson Lecture in the Humanities, Yale University, May 12, 2005)

2. John Lewis Gaddis, “History, Science, and the Study of International Relations,” in Ngaire Woods, ed., Explaining International Relations since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 32-47;

3. Leopold von Ranke, “The Great Powers,” in idem, The Theory and Practice of History, edited by Georg Iggers and Konrad von Moltke (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1973), pp. 65-101;

4. Ludwig Dehio, “The Passing of the European System,” in idem, Germany and World Politics in the Twentieth Century (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1959), pp. 124-133;

5. Paul Kennedy, “Mahan vs. Mackinder: Two Interpretations of the British Sea Power,” in Paul Kennedy, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1870-1945: Eight Studies (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1983), pp. 43-85;

6. John Lewis Gaddis, “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System,” in idem, The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 215-245;

7. Martin Wight, “Why Is There No International Theory?” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigation (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 17-34;

8. Steven Forde, “Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2 (May 1992), pp. 372-393;

9. Hedley Bull, “The Grotian Conception of International Society,” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigations (Cambridge, Mass., 1966), pp. 51-73;

10. J.L. Brierly, “The Classical Writers on International Law,” in idem, The Law of Nations, 6th edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963), pp. 25-40;

11. Michael W. Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Fall 1983);

12. Hedley Bull, “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,” World Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3 (April 1966), pp. 361-377;

13. J. David Singer, “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations,” in David J. Singer, Klaus Knorr and Sidney Verba, eds., The International System: Theoretical Essays (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1961);

14. K.J. Holsti, “Scholarship in an Era of Anxiety: The Study of International Politics during the Cold War,” in Tim Dunne, Michael Cox, and Ken Booth, eds., The Eighty Years Crisis: International Relations, 1919-1999 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998); pp. 17-46;

15. Hans J. Morgenthau, “Six Principles of Political Realism,” in idem The Politics Among Nations, 5th edition (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1972);

16. Robert Jervis, “Theories of War in an Era of Leading Power Peace,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 96, No. 1 (March 2002);

17. Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2 (Spring 1992);

18. Bruce R. Scott, “The Great Divide in the Global Village,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 1 (January/February 2001);

19. Garrett Hardin, “The Tragedy of Commons,” Science, Vol. 162 (December 13, 1966);

20. Rhoda E. Howard and Jack Donnelly, “Human Rights in World Politics,” in International Handbook of Human Rights (Westport, CT.: Greenwood Publishing, 1987).

21. 时殷弘:“从欧洲体系到全球体系——现代世界进程的一个基本方面”,《太平洋学报》1999年第3期

22. 时殷弘:“历史研究的若干基本问题”,《史学月刊》2001年第6期

23. 时殷弘:“关于国际关系的历史理解”,《世界经济与政治》2005年第10期

24. 时殷弘:“国际关系史料基本分类和主要类别史料例解”,《国际政治研究》2005年第3期

25. 时殷弘:“****和学习——20世纪非西方世界的现代民族主义”,载于时殷弘:《国际政治——理论探究•历史概观•战略思考》,当代世界出版社2002年版,第319-347页

26. 时殷弘:“美苏冷战史:机理、特征和意义”,《南开学报》2005年第3期

27. 时殷弘、叶凤丽:“现实主义·理性主义·革命主义——国际关系思想传统及其当代典型表现”,《欧洲》1995年第3期

28. 石 斌:“思想史视野与国际关系的历史和理论”,《史学月刊》2005年第6期

29. 李少军:“国际关系研究与诠释学方法”,《世界经济与政治》2006年第10期

30. 王正毅:“超越‘吉尔平式’的国际政治经济学——1990年代以来IPE及其在中国的发展”,《国际政治研究》2006年第2期

31. 郭树勇:“国际关系研究中的批判理论:渊源、理念及影响”,《世界经济与政治》2004年第7期

32. 苏长河:“为什么没有中国的国际关系理论?”《国际观察》2004年第4期

33. 秦亚青:“国际关系理论中国学派生成的可能和必然”,《世界经济与政治》2006年第3期

34. 秦亚青:“现实主义理论的发展及其批判”,《国际政治科学》2005年第2期

35. 秦亚青:“建构主义:思想渊源、理论流派与学术理念”,《国际政治研究》2006年第3期

36. 秦亚青:“西方国际关系学:知识谱系与理论发展”,《外交学院学报》2003年第3期;

37. 叶自成:“国际关系研究中的中国视野”,《外交评论》2005年第3期。



著 作:

一、节选:

1. Feriederich Meinecke, Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’Etat and Its Place in Modern History (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957), chapter 1;

2. Ludwig Dehio, The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle (New York: Alfred. A. Knopf, 1962), pp. 3-15;

3. Harold Nicolson, The Evolution of Diplomacy (New York: Collier Books, 1954), Chapters 2-4;

4. Geoffrey Barraclough, An Introduction to Contemporary History (Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Limited, 1964), Chapters 3-6;

5. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979), chapter 5;

6. Paul W. Schroeder, David Wetzel, Robert Jervis, and Jack S. Levy, eds., Systems, Stability, and statecraft: Essays on the International History of Modern Europe, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Introduction;

7. Robert Gilpin, “The Nature of Political Economy,” in idem, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investment (New York: Perseus Books Group, 1975);

8. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, 3rd edition (New York: Longman, 2001), pp. 20-52;

9. Robert O. Keohan, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Economy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 49-64.

二、原著

10. Ludwig Dehio, The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle,translated by Charles Fullman (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962)

11. Martin Wight, International Theory: Three Traditions, edited by Gabriele Wight and Brian Porter (New York: Holmes & Meiner, 1992)

12. Michael Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York: W.W. Norton, 1997)

13. Phil Williams et al. eds., Classic Readings of International Relations (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1999)

14. K.J. Holsti, International Politics: A Framework for Analysis, 7th edition (Englewood Cliffs., N.J.:Prentice-Hall, 1995)

15. 马克思、恩格斯:《共产党宣言》

16. 列宁:《帝国主义是资本主义的最高阶段》

17. 霍布斯:《利维坦》,第13章

18. 詹姆斯·多尔蒂、普法尔茨格拉夫:《争论中的国际关系理论》,世界知识出版社,2003版

19. 威廉森·默里等:《缔造战略》,世界知识出版社,2004年版

20. 保罗·肯尼迪:《大国的兴衰》,求实出版社,1988年版

21. 时殷弘:《现当代国际关系史(从16世纪到20世纪末)》,中国人民大学出版社 2006年版


来源:http://www.douban.com/group/topic/9312505/
附录国际关系及外交学专业主文献,分别参见:http://www.douban.com/group/topic/9312497/
http://www.douban.com/group/topic/9312488/
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
收藏收藏 转播转播 分享分享 分享淘帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-4-5 16:29 , Processed in 0.078125 second(s), 28 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表