政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 1046|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Anshan backs away from US deal

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2010-8-20 14:00:28 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
China’s Anshan Iron & Steel Group yesterday backed away from a planned investment in a US-based steel mill after the deal was heavily criticised by US lawmakers.
中国鞍钢集团(Anshan Iron & Steel Group)昨日放弃了投资一家美国钢厂的计划,此前该交易遭到美国国会议员的强烈批评。

The Chinese steel investment would have been the first of its kind in the US. The decision to postpone the investment comes as US security officials have forced at least two Chinese companies to abandon deals over the past year because they were seen as posing a threat to US national security. One transaction involved a Nevada mining company and the other a fibre optics maker.
鞍钢此次投资本会成为美国首例此类投资。在鞍钢决定推迟投资之前一年内,美国安全官员们已迫使至少两家中国公司放弃交易,因为这些交易被视为对美国国家安全构成威胁。这两项交易分别涉及一家内华达州的采矿企业和一家光纤制造商。
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
收藏收藏 转播转播 分享分享 分享淘帖
2#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-20 14:00:39 | 只看该作者
The circumstances surrounding the Anshan case are different than the other thwarted investments because the company’s proposed 14 per cent stake in a $175m facility in Mississippi is not believed to have been formally vetted by US security officials.
鞍钢案所处的境遇与其它受挫的投资不同,因为据信鞍钢交易并没有受到美国安全官员的正式审查。鞍钢计划投资美国密西西比州一家价值1.75亿美元的工厂,以换取14%的股权。

But the company said it was nevertheless turned off the investment by political opposition on Capitol Hill, where lawmakers do not have a formal say in such deals but can exert enough pressure to make foreign investments untenable. Similarly, the debate over Dubai Ports’ proposed bid for some US port operations in 2006 forced the emirate to pull back from the transaction even though it was formally approved.
但鞍钢表示,尽管如此,由于美国国会的政治反对,也只得放弃投资——国会议员们理论上对此类交易没有决定权,但能施加足够的压力,让外国投资流产。类似地,2006年,围绕迪拜港口(Dubai Ports)收购数个美国港口经营权而展开的辩论,也迫使迪拜撤出交易,尽管交易已获得了形式上的批准。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

3#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-20 14:00:48 | 只看该作者
While lawmakers in the US are often keen on disparaging deals by Chinese companies because they are seen as constituting a threat to “economic security”, the Cfius panel does not have the authority to block a transaction on such grounds and, experts say, would probably not have conducted a national security investigation on the Anshan proposal.
尽管美国国会议员常常热衷于刁难中国企业的交易,因为他们认为这些交易会对美国的“经济安全”构成威胁,但美国外国投资委员会(Cfius)并没有权力以这种理由来阻止某项交易,此外,据专家表示,该委员会很可能不会对鞍钢交易案展开国家安全调查。

Chen Ming, vice-chairman of Angang Steel, the listed subsidiary of Anshan, said in Hong Kong yesterday that Anshan was putting the investment “aside”, according to Reuters.
根据路透社(Reuters)的消息,鞍钢集团下属上市公司鞍钢股份(Angang Steel)的副董事长陈明昨日在香港表示,母公司鞍钢集团计划“搁置”这项投资。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

4#
 楼主| 发表于 2010-8-20 14:00:59 | 只看该作者
John Watkins, the head of the American Chamber of Commerce in China, wrote in a comment in the Wall Street Journal that opposition to the Anshan project represented a “major source of concern” to US businesses in China, because scuppering the deal could start a trend of antitrade measures across the Pacific.
中国美国商会(American Chamber of Commerce in China)主席华金声(John Watkins)在为《华尔街日报》(Wall Street Journal)撰稿时表示,鞍钢项目的反对声音反映了在华美国企业的一个“主要担忧之源”,因为扼杀这桩交易可能在太平洋两岸引发一轮反贸易措施。

The lawmakers’ efforts were strongly backed by the US steel industry, including Nucor, which has accused Beijing of heavily subsidising China’s steel industry. It is a claim Anshan has denied in the past.
美国国会议员的行为得到了美国钢铁行业的强烈支持,其中纽柯(Nucor)一直指责中国政府大力补贴中国的钢铁行业。鞍钢曾否认这种说法。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

5#
发表于 2010-10-28 20:40:33 | 只看该作者
这样精华的帖子一定要顶的!:victory:
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-4-6 05:10 , Processed in 0.078125 second(s), 29 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表