|
2#

楼主 |
发表于 2008-4-1 09:41:30
|
只看该作者
Hank
Paulson, the US Treasury secretary, may receive what his hosts consider a nice gift when he arrives in Beijing early on Wednesday – a strengthening Chinese currency poised to reach a significant new high.
The renminbi closed trading in China on Friday at Rmb7.017 to the dollar, on the verge of breaking through Rmb7.00, a symbolic moment following a period of accelerated appreciation since late October.
After years of arm twisting by Washington, where the currency has become a litmus test of Chinese responsiveness to US complaints on trade, Beijing expects Mr Paulson to acknowledge publicly the renminbi's gains.
But the bilateral prism through which Washington sees the issue gives a distorted picture of the reasons for the renminbi's strengthening, say analysts, and also exaggerates the real changes in the currency's value. “A small factor is the pressure from the US. A big factor is inflationary pressure in China,” said Gao Shanwen, an economist with Essence Securities in Beijing.
With inflation hitting a 12-year monthly high of 8.7 per cent in February, after several months of sharply higher food price rises, the currency has moved to centre stage as a policy instrument for Beijing.
The top ranks of the government have long been split on the need for the currency to rise more quickly, with objections from the economic planning ministry and the export lobby enough to keep the pace slow.
Wen Jiabao, the premier, has been ineffective in wresting the issue out of the bureaucratic morass it has long been caught in, preferring instead to wait until a consensus was forged on the issue, say local economists.
But while at the top of the US agenda, the currency has in some respects remained a second order issue for a Chinese government focused above all on maintaining fast economic growth. For Beijing, a fast-growing economy helps in turn address a range of difficult issues – the rich-poor gap and the underfunded health, education and welfare systems. “Without economic growth, everything else becomes really problematic,” Michael Enright, a consultant, and co-author of a new book, China Into the Future, said.
But the spectre of inflation has now galvanised the government on the currency. After rising by about 14 per cent over 30 months since mid-2005, when the US dollar peg was dropped, the renminbi has accelerated at an annualised pace of about 15-20 per cent against the US currency in the opening months of 2008.
A stronger Chinese currency helps reduce the cost of importing products such as soybeans, 80 per cent of which are used in pig feed. Chinese inflation has primarily been driven by higher food prices, especially of pork, the staple meat. The currency also remains helpful in taking the steam out of the swollen trade surplus, which has been a political problem in relations with big trading partners.
Incentives for policymakers to allow the currency to appreciate could be short-term, amid signs that headline inflation could fall from mid-year and that the trade surplus is peaking.
“I expect the pace of appreciation to slow in the second half of the year,” said Ha Jiming, of China International Capital, the country's largest investment bank, as inflation and the surplus eased.
But while Mr Paulson may give China credit for lifting the renminbi against the dollar, China's other trading partners have less reason to applaud. Europe, now China's largest trading partner and increasingly anxious about the size of the bilateral deficit, has seen the euro appreciate by more than 3 per cent this year against the Chinese unit. The Japanese yen, in turn, had strengthened by more than 7 per cent in 2008 by the end of last week.
As a result, the renminbi's effective exchange rate, the yardstick advocated by bodies such as the IMF, has not moved at all this year against its leading trading partners.
Such outcomes are hardening suspicions in Europe and elsewhere that the renminbi is still tracking the dollar. As long as the currency is rising against the greenback, however, Mr Paulson might consider that to be Brussels' and Tokyo's problem |
|