|
5#

楼主 |
发表于 2009-10-20 09:23:27
|
只看该作者
Fiscal Fix?
The fact that this year's fiscal revenue growth has lagged behind the economy's growth should not raise a red flag, said Ni Hongri, an official at the State Council's Development Research Center.
China's dependence on foreign trade contributed to falling revenues this year, prompting the government to raise export tax rebates more than once, which in turn led to steeper declines for revenues than economic growth.
Should the government reduce spending to offset lower revenues? Or could it tap its savings account?
The Ministry of Finance has repeatedly stressed that realizing the fiscal income goal for 2009 is putting enormous pressure on spending. Yet central government deposits at the central bank are plentiful. At the end August, for example, its deposits totaled roughly 2.9 trillion yuan.
The finance ministry tries to explain the fat bank account from a technical perspective, pointing to special characteristics of the Chinese accounting system. But, fundamentally, fiscal revenues have been increasing every year at a faster rate than expenditures.
Some observers wonder whether the government's budget can be adjusted in ways that neither widen the deficit nor force tax collectors to work harder.
Zhang Musheng, publisher of China Taxation Magazine, noted that the government owns more than 4 million autos. The fleet costs several hundred billion yuan to operate every year.
In addition, more than 17,000 offices for local governments, semi-official enterprises and universities are scattered around Beijing. The government also finances a vast number of training centers, some luxurious.
"If we can get rid of these, we can easily save 400 to 500 billion yuan," Zhang said.
Administration has been cited as another area for spending cuts. The percentage of fiscal spending earmarked for administrative expenditures increased to 18.3 percent in 2006 from 4.7 percent in 1978.
Perhaps improving the government's fiscal status need not solely rely on squeezing Chinese companies for more taxes. But for now, the tax man is taking the lead in the scramble for revenue targets. |
|