政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 492|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Breaking up BAA is the right thing to do

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2008-8-27 20:34:41 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Posted by: Economist.com | LONDON
Categories: BAA
BAA, which owns seven airports in Britain, including Heathrow and Gatwick, is to be required to sell three of its operations. An interim report from the Competition Commission, which is investigating BAA at the instigation of the Office of Fair Trading, recommends the sale of two airports in London and one in Scotland.

And not before time, says this week’s Economist.

The prescription may seem harsh, but so too were the findings that since BAA’s privatisation in 1987 the company has dragged its heels in building new terminals and runways. The hope is that once BAA’s monopoly around London is broken up, competition will force improvements at all three airports [Heathrow, Gatwick and Stansted]. Christopher Clarke, the commission’s deputy chairman, reckons that under separate owners each airport would press hard to get planning permission to build new runways and terminals. They would pay more attention to the needs of airlines and travellers, he thinks. The expectation is plausible. A queue of buyers has already lined up hoping to bid for Gatwick and Stansted, the two airports most likely to be sold. They are understood to be drawing up creative plans ranging from cheap and basic warehouses for low-cost carriers such as easyJet to luxurious lounges aimed at winning the hearts of frequent-flying businessmen.
The paper does not buy the argument that Heathrow's power as a hub prevents competition between London's airports.

There is little reason to think that an economy as large as London and its surrounding region cannot support two competing hub airports. If allowed to build a second runway, Gatwick could well become a second hub, and another runway there would bother fewer residents than at Heathrow.
The main argument against the break-up, articulated by BAA themselves and by John Willman in the Financial Times, is that it will complicate matters at a time when the government is on the verge of giving the go-ahead to a new runway. Colin Matthews, the chief executive of BAA, put it this way:

"Just as the Government is about to make the decisions that could lead to the first full-length runways being built in the South East since the second world war, the Commission risks creating uncertainty, delay and confusion at exactly the wrong time."
Hmm. I'm not convinced by that: I don't think a little more uncertainty and confusion in an uncertain, confused industry can exactly be considered deal-breakers.
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
收藏收藏 转播转播 分享分享 分享淘帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-4-7 17:38 , Processed in 0.125000 second(s), 29 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表