政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

楼主: applecan
打印 上一主题 下一主题

震惊:看看美国愤青门户论坛上都说中国什么!(转载)

[复制链接]
41#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:21:23 | 只看该作者
coz they wouldn’y dare to, US has to seriously think about the outcome after nuking China, thousands of American would be blowed up at the same time.
  
  
    因为他们不敢这么做,美国必须小心考虑对中国用核武所产生的结果,成千上万的美国人也会被同时炸飞。
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

42#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:21:45 | 只看该作者
What’re they going to do, send their entire population over here with knives?
  
  
    他们中国人能做什么?把他们整个人口用刀子武装起来然后派到我们美国来?
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

43#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:22:14 | 只看该作者
 r u retarded? they would use long-distance missile with nuclear warhead om submarine to blow the US up
  
  
    你是不是弱智呀?他们会用潜艇发射带核弹头的远程导弹把美国炸翻。
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

44#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:22:55 | 只看该作者
… What the f*ck? Do you have any idea how fast their technology is catching up? Within a few years’ time, their technological advances should rival that of the rest of the world.
  
  
    真特妈傻,你知道他们在技术方面追赶的有多快吗?几年之内,他们先进的技术能够匹敌整个世界。
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

45#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:23:27 | 只看该作者
Ignoring the fact that Japan’s army is now purely for defensive purposes, I be lieve that China is on par with the USA.
  
  
    不管日本的军队现在是完全用于防御的这个事实,我认为中国和美国的力量是一样强大的。
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

46#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:25:00 | 只看该作者
I don’t know who would win. China may have the numbers, but we have the better training, the better weaponry, and better access to resources. It really depends on the allies that rally behind the country as to who would win that war.Who struck first would also play a factor, and WHY they struck first would be a BIG issue on what other nations rally behind each nation. In all honesty, I think the US would win, but it would be a VERY long and VERY bloody war.
  
  
    我不知道谁能嬴,中国有人口,但我们有更好的训练,武器和可以利用的资源。谁能赢得胜利实际取决于哪个国家能得到更多的盟友的支持,谁先打击对方也是一个重要的取胜因素。为什么首先打击对方的原因也是其他国家决定支持任何一方所要考虑的最重要的因素。实话实说,我认为美国会赢,但肯定会是场非常长期的,血腥无比的战争。
  
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

47#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:25:59 | 只看该作者
And to the person that was talking about the Nazis getting crushed by the Russians… the only reason that happened is because by that point in the war, Germany had been running out o esources for some time.
  
  
    回答那个讨论俄国打败**的人,唯一的原因就是在战争进行到某一点时,德国有时物资跟不上了。
  
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

48#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:27:51 | 只看该作者
Technology may mean a lot. But they have enough nukes to take us out. For that
  
  
    reason we can do shit on the playing field. In a world full of technology it doesn’t take that much to catch up. They can have all the technology they want thanks to the internet. Besides. China has a sort of black curtain. The west probably doesn’t fully understand what they have. They do have machine guns…and that is enough. With proper motivation it wouldn’t take much to arm there large force sufficiently to take us out. Granted they may lose more people. But we would eventually lose, just because we were overwelmed.
  
  
    技术也许很重要,但他们也有足够干掉我们的核武。所以我们不能瞎玩闹而不重视了。现在世界上技术无处不在,想在技术上赶上一点也不难。他们可以得到他们想要的任何技术,感谢互联网。另外,中国有些黑幕。西方也许并不知道他们到底有什么。他们也有机枪。。。。那就足够了。只要有合适的号召鼓动,完善的装备他们数量巨大的武装力量而干掉我们一点也不难。就算他们会伤亡更多的人,但我们最终会输掉,我们会被他们的数量最终压倒的。
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

49#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:28:38 | 只看该作者
subs comparable to American subs in the 70’s, crappier planes, helicopters, long range bombers, everything. There is no way in hell China would ever catch up to the US military technology wise within the next half century at the least
  
  
    他们的潜艇就相当于美国70年代的,很烂的飞机,直升机,远程轰炸机,所有的一切。中国绝对他XX的在最少下半个世纪之前在军事技术领域赶不上美国。
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

50#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-9-16 23:29:08 | 只看该作者
China= Sleeping Giant… With their massive population and there unbelievably fast growing economy, It’s only a matter of time they become the most powerful nation… Oh how much would the American government hate that…
  
  
    中国=沉睡的巨人。。以他们巨大的人口和他们难以置信的经济增速。成为世界上最强大的国家只是个时间问题。。。啊,美国政府多么憎恨这点呀
  
回复 支持 反对

使用道具 举报

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-7-31 10:14 , Processed in 0.078125 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表