政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

楼主: 秋色夏天
打印 上一主题 下一主题

国际关系理论英文原版书

 关闭 [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-6-14 20:34:55 | 只看该作者
好强
12#
发表于 2006-6-15 09:01:40 | 只看该作者
what a charming girl!???? please go on !?? many thanks!
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-15 18:28:27 | 只看该作者
<p>???? The third and fourth basic values that states are usually expected to uphold are order and justice. States have a common interest in establishing and maintaining international order so that they can coexist and interact on a basis of stability, certainty, and predictability. To that end, states are expected to uphold international law: to keep their treaty commitments and to observe the rules, conventions, and customs of the international legal order. They are also expected to follow accepted practices of diplomacy and to support international organizations. International law, diplomatic relations, and international organizations can only exist and operate successfully if these expectations are generally met by most states most of the time. States are also?expected to uphold human rights. Today there is an elaborate international legal framework of human rights--civil, political, social, and economic--which has been developed since the end of the Second World War. Order and justice obviously are among the most fundamental values of international relations. That approach to the study of world politics is typical of International Society theories of IR(Bull 1995). It operates on the assumption that international relations can be best characterized as a world in which states are socially responsible actors and have a common interest in preserving international order and promoting international justice.</p><p>???? The final basic value that states are usually expected to uphold is the population's socioeconomic wealth and welfare. People expect their government to adopt appropriate policies to encourage high employment, low inflation, steady investment, the uninterrupted flow of trade and commerce, and so forth. Because national economies are rarely isolated from each other, most people also expect that the state will respond to the international economic environment in such a way as to enhance or at least defend and maintain the national standard of living.</p>
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-15 18:44:44 | 只看该作者
<p>???? States nowadays try to frame and implement economic policies that can maintain the stability of the international economy upon which they are all increasingly dependent. That usually involves economic policies that can deal adequately with international?markets, with the economic policies of other states, with foreign investment, with foreign exchange rates, with international trade, with international transportation and communications, and with other international economic relations that affect national wealth and welfare. Economic interdependence, meaning a high degree of mutual economic dependence among countries, is a striking feature of the contemporary state system. Some people consider that to be a good thing because it may increase overall freedom and wealth by expanding the global marketplace and thereby increasing participation, specialization, efficiency, and productivity. Other people consider it to be a bad thing because it may promote overall inequality by allowing rich and powerful countries, or countries with financial or technological advantages, to dominate poor and weak countries that lack those advantages. But either way,wealth and welfare obviously are among the most fundamental values of international relations. That approach to the study of world politics is typical of IPE(international political economy) theories of IR( Gilpin 1987). It operates on the assumption that international relations can be best characterized as fundamentally a socioeconomic world and not merely a political and military world.</p><p>????? Most people usually take these basic values(security;freedom;order and justice;welfare) for granted. They only become aware of them when something goes wrong--for example, during a war or a depression, when things begin to get beyond the control of individual states. On those learning occasions people wake up to the larger circumstances of their lives which in normal times are a silent or invisible background. At those moments they are likely to become sharply aware of what they take for granted, and of how important these values really are in their everyday lives. We become aware of national independence and our freedom as citizens when peace is no longer guaranteed. We become aware of internaional order and justice when some states, especially major powers, abuse, exploit, denounce, or disregard international law or trample on human rights. We become aware of national welfare and our own personal socioeconomic well-being when foreign countries or international investors use their economic clout to jeopardize our standard of living.</p>
15#
发表于 2006-6-15 23:23:53 | 只看该作者
<p>感谢~~~ 常常感慨美国的国际关系教育的发达,培养了大批理论大家 </p><p>与它们相比,国内的国关学科还很落后,尤其在研究方法的训练上</p><p>?应该加强交流~ </p>
16#
发表于 2006-6-16 16:00:20 | 只看该作者
<p>厉害</p>
17#
发表于 2006-6-16 16:32:22 | 只看该作者
[quote=寒星,2006-06-15 23:23]<br /><p>感谢~~~ 常常感慨美国的国际关系教育的发达,培养了大批理论大家 </p><p>与它们相比,国内的国关学科还很落后,尤其在研究方法的训练上</p><p>?应该加强交流~ </p><br />[/quote]<br />确实如此 !
18#
发表于 2006-6-18 21:47:09 | 只看该作者
能问一下中日关系处于低谷的? 低谷用英语赞美 说马
19#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-6-21 05:40:20 | 只看该作者
<p>有两天没有来过了,不好意思,刚看到你的问题.</p><p>"中日关系处于低谷"的"低谷",我不知道确切的英语应该是什么,</p><p>但是根据理解,我可以该点建议.</p><p>1,International Relations 里面常用的单词 "<strong>dilemma</strong>" 表示 政治关系的窘境,进退两难的局面.A <strong>dilemma </strong>is a problem offering two solutions,neither of which is acceptable. the two options are often described as the <strong>horns of a dilemma,</strong> neither of which is comfortable.???</p><p>?"<strong>Security Dilemma": </strong>In International Relations, the "security?dilemma" refers to a situation wherein two or more states are drawn into conflict, possiblely even war, over security concerns, even though none of the states actually desire conflict.</p><p>2,According what I have intepreted, if I were you, I would like to describe the situation as <strong>" China-Japan relations has been in the lowest point since reestablishment of diplomatic relations in 1972."</strong></p><p>最后,推荐你个很不错的IR英文网站,里面集中了一些IR知识的连接.</p><p>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:International_Relations</p>
20#
发表于 2006-6-21 08:37:42 | 只看该作者
真的很不错,我们学院发了本原版的<经济学原理>,曼昆写的浅显,比译文好的多```
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-7-20 05:37 , Processed in 0.531250 second(s), 21 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表