政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

楼主: aarthurr
打印 上一主题 下一主题

中国国际关系智囊团

 关闭 [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2006-3-19 13:56:08 | 只看该作者
<p>谢了啊,呵呵</p>
12#
发表于 2006-3-19 15:15:43 | 只看该作者
这方面的资料太少了,所以只要出来一点都是弥足珍贵
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-19 21:27:03 | 只看该作者
<p>Chinese People’s Institute of Foreign Affairs<br />CPIFA is an arm of the Foreign Ministry and is not a think tank per<br />se .It has a long history dating to December 1949 and is the<br />Chinese government’s principal institution devoted to “people-to-people<br />diplomacy.” During its first two decades CPIFA performed a valuable<br />channel for informal exchanges with elites from nations with which the<br />PRC did not have formal diplomatic relations. In the last two decades,<br />though, its focus has been more on hosting former politicians and<br />ex-diplomats. It is the principal institutional channel through which<br />former heads of state, officials, and ambassadors visit China after leaving<br />office. It is currently headed by former ambassador Mei Zhaorong. The<br />institute also publishes the informative Foreign Affairs Journal (in<br />English).</p><p>China Association for International Friendly Contact<br />The CAIFC is something of a military counterpart to the CPIFA,<br />although it has connections to the civilian foreign affairs establishment as<br />well (Figure 4). This duality was evidenced in the fact that General Wang<br />Zhen was its first honorary president while former Foreign Minister<br />Huang Hua was its first president. On the military side, it appears that<br />CAIFC is linked to the Intelligence Bureau of the Liaison Department of<br />the PLA’s General Political Department. On the civilian side, it appears<br />to have ties to both the Ministry of State Security and the Ministry of<br />Foreign Affairs. Its offices today are in a compound in north Beijing<br />shared by other PLA units. CAIFC was founded in 1984, and is involved<br />in bringing both retired civilian and military personages to China<br />(although it was not as active in the 1990s as it was in the 1980s). One<br />of its major responsibilities is to administer the Centre for Peace and<br />Development Studies .</p><p></p>
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-3-19 22:09:12 | 只看该作者
<p>Centre for Peace and Development Studies Perhaps the most important activity of the institute is its publication Heping yu fazhan (Peace and Development). This quarterly journal contains extremely high-quality analyses of international affairs written by civilian and military analysts, both permanent and associated research staff. It is a useful “window” into the thinking of PLA international security specialists, and is probably the highest-quality journal on current international relations topics published in China today. Its breadth and depth exceed that of the journals published by CICIR or CIIS, although articles in the journal of the CASS Institute of World Economics and Politics are more theoretical. Taken together, the journals of CPDS, CICIR, CIIS and the China Institute of International Strategic Studies (the think tank affiliated with the Second Department of the PLA General Staff Department) offer excellent insights into the analysis of contem-porary international affairs being carried out in China’s civilian and military intelligence communities. The CPDS claims it is “mainly financed” by CAIFC, which means its funds largely come from the Ministry of State Security and PLA’s General Political Department. Xinhua Centre for World Affairs The Xinhua Centre for World Affairs (Xinhuashe shijie wenti yanjiu zhongxin) (XCWA) was established in 1991 under the International Department of Xinhua News Agency (Figure 6). It only has about ten full-time research fellows (many of whom are also simultaneously work- ing in the International Department) and a small secretarial staff, but a large number of affiliated fellows, mostly retired from Xinhua. The Centre claims to focus primarily on “big powers and India.” It plays an important role in the selection of materials to be translated and included in the daily Reference News (Cankao ziliao or Da cankao), not an unimportant task insofar as this publication is a critical source of infor- mation on international affairs for China’s top leaders and officials. The XCWA also has several other neibu document channels to the leadership and other international affairs units. Nevertheless, its influence should not be overstated, as it seems to be more a loose group of elderly Xinhua<br />correspondents than an organized institution.</p><p>China Society for Strategy and Management??????????????The CSSM has a relatively small permanent research staff of approxi-<br />mately ten, but operates principally as an association to draw together<br />experts from across Beijing and the rest of the country. They have modest<br />office space in the National Library of China’s annex building, but clearly<br />are fairly flush with funds. Only a minor degree of its sponsored research<br />is on international affairs, and this comes to light in the important<br />quarterly journal Zhanlu¨e yu guanli (Strategy and Management). These<br /><strong>articles often break with the mould of more official and mainstream IR<br />journals.</strong>???</p><p>Shanghai Institute of International Studies</p><p>Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences</p><p>China’s IR think tanks have grown and matured considerably over the<br />past two decades since relations with the Western and Asian countries<br />began to grow. Much of the credit for the increased quality of research is<br />owed to the role played by foreign institutions in educating and training<br />Chinese researchers. While they still operate with their own distinctly<br />Chinese paradigms, and also stubbornly cling to realist, state-centric and<br />overeign-based analysis, researchers are much more aware of foreign<br />concepts and methodologies of research. While Westerners may not agree<br />with their analysis of international affairs, at least they now come closer<br />o speaking the same language. However, there remains a large<br />“perception gap” between their analyses and those of American, Euro-<br />pean, Japanese or other Asian IR and security analysts – and there is<br />minimal evidence that this gap is being narrowed.</p><p>中国国际关系智囊团对国际外交政策的影响时有波动,但总体上来说是在增长的。其结果是政府官员和领导人会更加熟悉世界事物,意味着对将要采取的行动的后果有更加深刻的认识,更好的应对国际局势,这也是提高政府执政能力的一个方面。</p><p>以上介绍的准确性将由真正在其中工作的人员去评判,我相信我们当中的某些同学某一天会加入这一行列。更为重要的是希望本文会对同学们的职业规划有所帮助,并祝愿大家将来会对中国与世界的关系作出重要、积极的贡献。这也是每个人的梦想,愿它成真!</p>
15#
发表于 2006-3-20 20:03:56 | 只看该作者
外院是1955年成立滴!
16#
发表于 2006-4-21 19:13:32 | 只看该作者
继续啊
leegend 该用户已被删除
17#
发表于 2006-4-21 21:14:43 | 只看该作者
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
18#
发表于 2006-6-2 09:21:03 | 只看该作者
<p>good!</p>
19#
发表于 2006-6-2 14:35:15 | 只看该作者
呵呵,都是学者 型人才啊!!
20#
发表于 2006-6-6 17:38:40 | 只看该作者
呵呵
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-8-7 14:54 , Processed in 0.078125 second(s), 23 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表