|
1#

楼主 |
发表于 2009-5-6 09:38:40
|
只看该作者
However, an excessive increase of 4.58 trillion yuan in loans during the first quarter should be a matter of concern. Government revenues witnessed negative growth in the first quarter. January, February and March saw fiscal revenues decline 17 percent, 1.2 percent and 8 percent, respectively.
Generally speaking, macro-regulation measures have started to function. But in light of the fact that the policy requiring some time to show its impact on the market, and that exporting enterprises usually sign contracts in March and April, the economic prospects for the first half of 2009 and the whole year may be clarified in May.
To deal with the crisis, we need a panoramic picture. We also need to understand that this crisis has characteristics that set it apart from the Asian financial crunch of 1997.
First, the origin of latest crisis is different. The cause of this financial tsunami was a collapse of the American real estate and finance industries, which accounted for 20 percent of American GDP. The amount of financial derivatives in the United States is eight times global GDP and accounts for 70 percent of global liquidity.
Second, the path of the crisis' spread is different. The epicenter is the United States, and shockwaves have spread to Europe, Japan, emerging economies and developing countries. The possibility of large-scale aftershocks still haunts the world.
Third, the influence of this crisis is different. A major decline in demand by developed countries will dampen export industries in emerging economies and developing countries, which may impede economic development and cause social instability.
China's economic development has three attributes that should be considered. First, its economy depends excessively on exports. The ratio of foreign trade to GDP increased to 59 percent in 2008 from 32 percent in 1998. Second, economic growth is based on exports and investments: 60 percent of the GDP growth from 1998 to 2007 was linked to investment and exports. Exports accounted for 33 percent of GDP in 2008. Last but not least, domestic consumption's contribution to GDP has been small. |
|