|
2#

楼主 |
发表于 2008-9-4 20:42:29
|
只看该作者
Such a reaction represents a substantial shift in both the attitude and role of the wealthy Chinese. Once treated with the utmost suspicion, they now enjoy an almost celebrity-status, often gracing the front covers of glossy magazines. Yet with that new-found fame is now coming a level of responsibility in a country where confidence in the state's ability to provide everything has been dramatically eroded.
“Many companies were feeling that they needed to give something back and the earthquake has brought that feeling to the fore,” says Rupert Hoogewerf, editor of Hurun Report. “But they also realise that being seen to do the right thing is very important, too.”
A few years ago, China's entrepreneurs were almost completely uninvolved in private philanthropy. But even before the earthquake, there were signs that the idea was starting to take hold.
Zhang and Soho China have been at the forefront of that change. The company's first forays into the field were more prosaic than practical. When China was at the sharp end of much US criticism in the wake of 9/11, when a handful of Chinese had been witnessed celebrating, Zhang helped organise a devotional prayer on behalf of the victims that was televised on CN*. And in 2003, when Beijing was paralysed by the Sars epidemic, the company helped organise a day of kite-flying as a morale-boosting exercise for the public.
Since then, Soho has moved onto more substantial initiatives, mostly in education. It sponsors first-year university students from poor families and provides incentives for teachers to work in more remote areas. Zhang's family holiday this year will be a trip around 23 schools in Gansu province, the poor north-western province where her husband comes from. Zhang, who has two children, aged 8 and 10, calls it a “family service project”.
“We encourage everyone at the company to do a service project – not just senior managers,” she says.
The company has always had a modern sheen, bringing in avant-garde foreign architects to design projects while many of its developer rivals were churning out cookie-cutter high-rises. In the airy foyer of its new offices in Beijing, a funky sculpture of three pigs stands alongside a group of table-tennis tables for lunchtime recreation.
A regular visitor to the World Economic Forum's annual meeting at Davos, Zhang says she was impressed by Bill Gates, who spoke about his charity work, and her company has created its own philanthropic foundation. But, she says, the current government regulations in China make it very hard for companies to actually conduct their own charity work.
Private charities and non-governmental organisations are still viewed with suspicion by China's one-party state. They can be created, but only if they go through a complicated process of partnering with a government institution.
“The system is simply not there at the moment,” says Zhang. Soho is planning to hold a small forum of other businesses to lobby for approval of legislation for private charities, which would provide incentives and a simpler legal mechanism for companies to donate money.
The recent surge in private philanthropy is the latest twist in the rapid emergence of a new class of super-rich in China. The explosion in the country's economy over the last two decades has also produced an explosion in private wealth.
When Hurun published the country's first rich list in 1999, it required a personal fortune of just $6m to make it into the top 50. By the time of the most recent list, which was published last year, it included 500 individuals and the minimum requirement was $100m.
More remarkable than that has been the dramatic rise in the number of billionaires: according to Hurun, the number of mainland Chinese dollar billionaires has jumped from seven in 2004 to 106. (A separate list compiled by Forbes lists 66 Chinese billionaires. The lists differ because many of the figures are based on estimates of the value of private companies and because, in some cases, it is unclear how company ownership is divided among different family members.)
Below the level of the super-rich, there is also a rapidly expanding class of millionaires. According to the 2008 World Wealth Report by Merrill Lynch and Cap Gemini, China has 415,000 people with $1m dollar in disposable assets. This makes the country home to more millionaires in real terms than any other in the world.
“They [the new super-rich] are beginning to dance without their chains,” explains Hoogewerf. He argues that the country's new wealthy have gone through the initial stage of securing their family's financial independence and have established relationships with the government and paid their taxes, so that there is no legal cloud over their heads. “In the next stage, they can really do anything they want, whether it is buying art or land or investing in a mine,” he says.
This growth of private fortunes is the result of several factors. First, China has witnessed a surge in entrepreneurship over the last two decades which has produced a new generation of successful private companies. Over time, a number of these businesspeople and their companies have started to achieve a critical mass that has made them industry leaders. These include manufacturers such as Lu Guanqiu's Wanxiang auto parts group and Zong Qinghou's Wahaha group, one of the biggest producers of soft drinks in China.
Second, there has been the boom in the mainland stock market, which has seen share prices more than triple in two years. A string of entrepreneurs have used the soaring market to list their companies, and in the process have seen their net worth increase by several times.
The top two spots in the 2007 Hurun list are held by women. In first place was Yang Huiyan, whose 59 per cent stake in her family's real estate business, Country Garden, which went public in Hong Kong last year, was worth $17.5bn last October (shares in most Chinese companies have fallen sharply since then). In second place was Zhang Yin of Nine Dragons Paper, the recycling company which also listed recently.
Third, hot property markets in many of China's larger cities have expanded the net wealth of the country's rich, many of whom have a significant share of their investments in the real estate sector.
Given that this new class of super-rich has come from nowhere, it is unsurprising that almost all are first generation businesspeople – there is very little inherited wealth on the list. In the early days of economic reform, to start a private business was still a politically risky thing to do and a few of the first entrepreneurs were from the fringes of society. Some, such as Yin Mingshan, head of motorbike and car group Lifan, had even spent time in jail. So, they felt they had little to lose.
Yet being a successful entrepreneur has started to become more acceptable. An interesting feature of the recent lists has been the number of people who are members of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) – about one-third. The CCP let businesspeople enter its ranks in 1999, as a way of broadening the party's base and preventing the development of a rival power centre. For canny entrepreneurs, who know that official friends are important for all aspects of business, party membership has become an excellent way of networking and building government relationships.
At this year's annual meetings of the National People's Congress, the legislature, and the China People's Political Consultative Conference, an advisory body, there were about 80 delegates from the 2007 rich list.
Zhang Yin, head of the Nine Dragons group and a delegate to the CPPCC, caused a storm by proposing that income tax rates for top-earners should be slashed by one-third. Xinhua, the state news agency, dismissed her proposals as “pro-rich”.
The rich lists provide other insights into recent shifts in the economy. The double-digit growth of the last five years has been mostly the result of an investment boom which has created a large number of fortunes in the real estate sector. Given that this is an industry where you cannot do business without close relations with local officials – and where there have been several high-profile corruption cases – the emergence of so many real estate moguls has not been uniformly welcomed.
Public attitudes to the rich have also shifted sharply in recent years. In the early days of the reform period, the conventional wisdom among many Chinese was that anyone who had amassed a significant amount of capital must have done so through some dodgy deal with the authorities. Even in 1999, when Hoogewerf first started publishing rich lists, many of the new wealthy were keen to keep their names off them for fear that it would attract the attention of the tax authorities or other government officials. Indeed, several of the most prominent early tycoons ended up being investigated by the authorities. |
|