|
Hayek, F.A. 1945. “The use of knowledge in society.” American Economic Review 35(4): 519-530.
Rosecrance, Richard N. 1985. The rise of the trading state: commerce and conquest in the modern world. New York: Basic Books (esp. pp.3-43).
_____. 1996. “The rise of the virtual state.” Foreign Affairs 75(4): 45-61.
_____. 2002. “International security and the virtual state: states and firms in world politics.” Review of International Studies 28: 443-455.
Roll, Richard, and Talbott, John R. 2003. “Political freedom, economic liberty, and prosperity.” Journal of Democracy 14(3): 75-89.
Elman, Miriam Fendius. 1998. “Review essay: the democratic peace debate: what happened to IPE?” Review of International Political Economy 5(3): 565-581.
Mansfield, Edward D., Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002. “Why democracies cooperate more: electoral control and international trade agreements.” International Organization 56(3): 477-513.
Liberal institutionalism
Keohane, Robert O. 1984. After Hegemony: cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press (esp. chapter 4, 5, 6, and 7).
_____. 1987. “Power and interdependence revisited.” International Organization 41(4): 725-753.
Holsti, Kal J. 1978. “A new international politics? Diplomacy in complex interdependence.” International Organization 32(2): 513-530.
Axelrod, Robert, and Keohane, Robert O. 1985. “Achieving cooperation under anarchy: strategies and institutions.” World Politics 38(1): 226-254.
Debate over cooperation
Baldwin, David A. 1993. Neorealism and neoliberalism: the contemporary debate. New York: Columbia University Press.
Nye, Joseph S. Jr. 1988. “Neorealism and neoliberalism.” World Politics 40(2): 235-251.
Powell, Robert. 1994. “Anarchy in international relations theory: the neorealist-neoliberal debate.” International Organization 48(2): 313-344.
Niou, Emerson M. S., and Ordeshook, Peter C. 1994. “ ‘Less filling, tastes great’: the realist-neoliberal debate.” World Politics 46(2): 209-234.
Oye, Kenneth. 1993. Economic discrimination and political exchange: world political economy in the 1930s and 1980s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rosenau, James N. 1986. “Before cooperation: hegemons, regimes, and habit-driven actors in world politics.” International Organization 40(4): 849-894.
Yarbrough, Beth V., and Yarbrough, Robert M. 1987. “Cooperation in the liberalization of international trade: after hegemony, what?” International Organization 41(1): 1-26.
Buzan, Barry. 1984. “Economic structure and international security: the limits of the liberal case.” International Organization 38(4): 597-624.
Grieco, Joseph M. 1988. “Anarchy and the limits of cooperation: a realist critique of the newest liberal institutionalism.” International Organization 42(3): 485-507.
5/11: Marxism 马克思主义理论\r
Introductory Reading基本介绍
Cohn, Theodore H. 2003. Global political economy: theory and practice. 2nd edition. New York: Longman. Chapter 5 (pp.119-145).
Classic Reading经典选读
Gill, Stephen and Law, David. 1988. The global political economy: perspectives, problems, and policies. New York, London, Toronto, Sydney, Tokyo, and Singapore: Harvester Wheatsheaf. Chapter 6 (pp.71-82).
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1979. The capitalist world economy. New York: Cambridge University Press. Chapter 1 (pp.1-36).
Further Reading参考阅读\r
Marxism:
Marx, Karl and Engels, Friedrich. 1967. The communist manifesto with an introduction by A. J. P. Taylor. London: Penguin Books.
Lenin, Vladimir I. 1939. Imperialism: the highest stage of capitalism, a popular outline. New York: International Publishers.
Oneal, John R., and Oneal, Frances H. 1988. “Hegemony, imperialism, and the profitability of foreign investments.” International Organization 42(2): 347-373.
Marquetti, Adalmir A. 2003. “Analyzing historical and regional patterns of technical change from a classical-Marxian perspective.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 52: 191-200.
Dependency theory
Cardoso, Fernando H. and Faletto, Enzo. 1979. Dependency and development in Latin American. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
Special issue on dependence and dependency in the global system. 1978. International Organization 32(1).
Valenzuela, J. Samuel., and Valenzuela, Arturo. 1978. “Modernization and dependency: alternative perspectives in the study of Latin American underdevelopment.” Comparative Politics 10(4): 535-557.
Smith, Tony. 1979. “The underdevelopment of development literature: the case of dependency theory.” World Politics 31(2): 247-288.
_____. 1981. “The logic of dependency theory revisited.” International Organization 35(4): 755-761.
Caporaso, James A. 1980. “Dependency theory: continuities and discontinuities in development studies.” International Organization 34(4): 605-628.
Ahiakpor, James C. W. 1985. “The success and failure of dependency theory: the experience of Ghana.” International Organization 39(3): 535-552.
Blaney, David L. 1996. “Reconceptualizing autonomy: the difference dependence theory makes.” Review of International Political Economy 3(3): 459-497.
World-system theory and its critics
Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The modern world-system I: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. San Diego, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, and Toronto: Academic Press.
_____. 1980. The modern world-system II: mercantilism and the consolidation of the European world-economy, 1600-1750. San Diego, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, and Toronto: Academic Press.
_____. 1989. The modern world-system III: the second era of great expansion of the capitalist world-economy, 1730-1840s. San Diego, New York, Boston, London, Sydney, Tokyo, and Toronto: Academic Press.
Chase-Dunn, Christopher and Hall, Thomas D. 1997. Rise and demise: comparing world-systems. Boulder and Oxford: Westview Press.
Taylor, Peter J. 1996. “What’s modern about the modern world-system? Introducing ordinary modernity through world hegemony.” Review of International Political Economy 3(2): 260-286.
Smith, David A. 1997. “Technology, commodity chains and global inequality: South Korea in the 1990s.” Review of International Political Economy 4(4): 734-762.
Brenner, Robert. 1977. “The origins of capitalist development: a critique of neo-Smithian Marxism.” New Left Review 104: 25-92.
Skocpol, Theda. 1977. “Wallerstein’s world capitalist system: a theoretical and historical critique.” American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 1075-1090.
Janowitz, Morris. 1977. “A sociological perspective on Wallerstein.” American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 1090-1097.
Thirsk, Joan. 1977. “Economic and social development on a European-world scale.” American Journal of Sociology 82(5): 1097-1102.
Zolberg, Aristide R. 1981. “Origins of the modern world system: a missing link.” World Politics 33(2): 253-281.
Andrews, Bruce. 1982. “The political economy of world capitalism: theory and practice.” International Organization 36(1): 135-163.
Garst, Daniel. 1985. “Wallerstein and his critics.” Theory and Society 14(4): 469-495.
Denemark, Robert A. and Thomas, Kenneth P. 1988. “The Brenner-Wallerstein debate.” International Studies Quarterly 32(1): 47-66.
Neo-Gramscian analysis
Cox, Robert W. 1976. “On thinking about future world order.” World Politics 28(2): 175-196.
_____. 1977. “Labor and hegemony.” International Organization 31(3): 358-424.
_____. 1979. “Ideologies and the new international economic order: reflections on some recent literature.” International Organization 33(2): 257-302.
_____. 1980. “Labor and hegemony: a rely.” International Organization 34(1): 159-176.
_____. 1986. “Social forces, states and world orders: beyond international relations theory”, in Neorealism and its critics edited by Robert Keohane. New York: Columbia University Press.
Douglas, William A., and Godson, Roy S. 1980. “Labor and hegemony: a critique.” International Organization 34(1): 149-158.
Gale, Fred. 1998. “Cave ‘Cave! Hic dragones’: a neo-Gramscian deconstruction and reconstruction of international regime theory.” Review of International Political Economy 5(2): 252-283.
Morton, Adam David. 2003. “Historicizing Gramsci: situating ideas in and beyond their context.” Review of International Political Economy 10(1): 118-146. |
|