政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 714|回复: 0
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Who is China Inc?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2008-8-7 18:07:52 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Lex

Thursday, August 07, 2008
  

  
Just
who is China Inc? The buyer feared by governments around the world – and revered by cash-strapped investment banks – comes in several guises, including state-controlled companies and a clutch of sovereign entities. Rather than being part of a carefully-choreographed strategy, however, sovereign buyers appear to be jostling for a piece of the action.

China Development Bank, the policy lender, entered the fray with the purchase of a $3bn stake in Barclays of the UK a year ago. Now it is reportedly sniffing around Dresdner Bank of Germany. CDB is the natural repository for banking assets, although China Investment Corporation may disagree. The sovereign wealth fund was established last year with a brief to enhance investment returns on a slug of foreign exchange reserves – a mandate it rather blew with its maiden investments in Blackstone and Morgan Stanley. Shares in the US financial firms have subsequently slumped, with Blackstone down 40 per cent since the June 2007 purchase. The third big sovereign buyer is the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (Safe), which operates under the central bank and owns small stakes in oil majors BP and Total of France. It recently agreed to put more than $2.5bn into a fund run by private equity firm TPG.

Happily for sellers, not all China's funds were created equal. CIC is effectively funded from foreign exchange reserves via bond issuance. It pays a coupon of around 4-5 per cent and bears currency risk on top. China Development Bank, which was recapitalised by CIC, paid a similar rate for its latest bond issue on Wednesday. CIC's initial kitty of $200bn looks big, but the bulk of that was spoken for at the outset. SAFE, by contrast, has lower funding costs and more cash: China accumulated almost $300bn of foreign exchange reserves in the first half of this year. The chances of Chinese funds competing against each other is remote, but not without precedence – state-owned oil majors have chafed over oil field assets. Either way, with this much money swilling around, the temptation to splash out will remain strong
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
收藏收藏 转播转播 分享分享 分享淘帖
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-7-21 23:38 , Processed in 0.375000 second(s), 29 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表