政治学与国际关系论坛

 找回密码
 注册

QQ登录

只需一步,快速开始

扫一扫,访问微社区

查看: 284|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

国际关系理论与方法研究~~(探讨)

 关闭 [复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
1#
发表于 2005-7-22 17:45:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
<p> 国际关系研究方法演进的几个阶段:</p><p> 传统时期(20世纪20年代&mdash;&mdash;五六十年代) <br /> 行为/实证时期(20世纪五六十年代&mdash;&mdash;八十年代) <br /> 后实证时期(20世纪八十年代至今)</p><p> 国际关系研究主要方法: </p><p><br /> 传统主义(Traditionalism)<br /> An approach to international relations that <br /> emphasises the studying of such disciplines as <br /> diplomatic history, international law, and <br /> philosophy in an attempt to develop better <br /> insights. Traditionalists tend to be skeptical of <br /> behavioralist approaches that are confined to <br /> strict scientific standards that include formal <br /> hypothesis testing and, usually, the use of <br /> statistical analysis. </p><p> (Viotti, P. and M. Kauppi, (eds.). 1987. <br /> International Relations Theory. Macmillan <br /> Publishing Company, New York). </p><p><br /> 行为主义/实证主义(Behavioralism/ Positivism)<br /> An approach to the study of politics or other <br /> social phenomena that focuses on the actions and <br /> interactions among units by using scientific <br /> methods of observation to include quantification <br /> of variables whenever possible. A practitioner of <br /> behavioralism is often referred to as a <br /> behavioralist. Behaviorism refers to the ideas <br /> held by those behavioral scientists who consider <br /> only observed behavior as relevant to the <br /> scientific enterprise and who reject what they <br /> consider to be metaphysical notions of "mind" or <br /> "consciousness". </p><p> (Viotti, P. and M. Kauppi, (eds.). 1987. <br /> International Relations Theory. Macmillan <br /> Publishing Company, New York)</p><p><br /> 后实证主义(Post-Positivism)<br /> Positivist methodologies in IR provoked <br /> post-positivist reactions including critical <br /> theory, postmodernism, constructivism, and <br /> normative theory. Post-positivism also is a broad <br /> church. Post-positivist approaches include: <br /> critical theory; postmodernism; constructivism; <br /> and normative theory. </p><p></p>
分享到:  QQ好友和群QQ好友和群 QQ空间QQ空间 腾讯微博腾讯微博 腾讯朋友腾讯朋友 微信微信
收藏收藏 转播转播 分享分享 分享淘帖
2#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-22 17:46:38 | 只看该作者
<p>Critical theory is a development of Marxist <br /> thought; it seeks to unmask the global domination <br /> of the rich North over the poor South. Critical <br /> theory views knowledge as inherently political; <br /> social scientists and social science are <br /> instruments of power.</p><p> Postmodernism disputes the notions of reality, of <br /> truth, of the idea that there is or can be an <br /> ever-expanding knowledge of the human world. <br /> Narratives, including metanarratives, are always <br /> constructed by a theorist and they are thus always <br /> contaminated by his or her standpoint and <br /> prejudices. Narratives can thus be deconstructed: <br /> i.e. taken apart to disclose their arbitrary <br /> elements and biased intentions.</p><p> Constructivists agree with positivists that we can <br /> accumulate valid knowledge about the world. But in <br /> contrast to positivists, constructivists emphasize <br /> the role of ideas, of shared knowledge of the <br /> social world. States construct one another in <br /> their relations and in so doing they also <br /> construct the international anarchy that de?nes <br /> their relations. Anarchy is not a natural <br /> condition; anarchy is what states make of it.</p><p> Normative theory attempts to clarify the basic <br /> moral issues of international relations. The main <br /> normative outlooks are cosmopolitanism and <br /> communitarianism. The questions raised by these <br /> outlooks are complex, e.g.: Which rights do states <br /> have? Which rights do individuals have? Do <br /> individual rights come before state rights? <br /> International ethics also concern the moral <br /> choices of statespeople.</p><p> (ROBERT JACKSON and GEORG SORENSEN: Introduction <br /> to International Relations - Theories and <br /> Approaches Second Edition, Oxford University <br /> Press, 2003).</p><p><br /></p>
3#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-22 17:46:58 | 只看该作者
博弈论Game Theory<br /> A decision-making approach based on the assumption <br /> of actor rationality in a situation of <br /> competition. Each actor tries to maximize gains or <br /> minimize losses under conditions of uncertainty <br /> and incomplete information, which requires each <br /> actor to rank order preferences, estimate <br /> probabilities, and try to discern what the other <br /> actor is going to do. In a two-person zero-sum <br /> game, what one actor wins the other loses; if A <br /> wins, 5, B loses 5, and the sum is zero. In a <br /> two-person non-zero or variable sum game, gains <br /> and losses are not necessarily equal; it is <br /> possible that both sides may gain. This is <br /> sometimes referred to as a positive-sum game. In <br /> some games, both parties can lose, and by <br /> different amounts or to a different degree. <br /> So-called n-person games include more than two <br /> actors or sides. Game theory has contributed to <br /> the development of models of deterrence and arms <br /> race spirals, but it is also the basis for work <br /> concerning the question of how collaboration among <br /> competitive states in an anarchic world can be <br /> achieved: The central problem is that the rational <br /> decision for an individual actor such as a state <br /> may be to "defect" and go it alone as opposed to <br /> taking a chance on collaboration with another <br /> state actor. Dealing with this problem is a <br /> central concern of much of the literature on <br /> international regimes, regional integration, and <br /> conflict resolution. <p> (Viotti, P. and M. Kauppi, (eds.). 1987. <br /> International Relations Theory. Macmillan <br /> Publishing Company, New York).</p>
4#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-7-22 17:47:19 | 只看该作者
<p>经验实证理论Empirical Theory<br /> An empirical theory in the social or natural <br /> sciences relates to facts and provides an <br /> explanation or prediction for observed phenomena. <br /> Hypotheses associated with empirical theories are <br /> subject to test against real-world data or facts. <br /> The theorist need not have any purpose in <br /> developing such empirical theories other than <br /> satisfying his or her intellectual curiosity, <br /> although many will seek to make their work "policy <br /> relevant" .</p><p> (Viotti, P. and M. Kauppi, (eds.). 1987. <br /> International Relations Theory. Macmillan <br /> Publishing Company, New York).</p><p><br /> 规范理论Normative Theory</p><p><br /> Normative theory deals precisely with values and <br /> value preferences. Unlike empirical theory, <br /> however, propositions in normative theory are not <br /> subject to empirical test as a means of <br /> establishing their truth or falsehood. Normative <br /> theory deals not with what is, the domain of <br /> empirical theory. Rather, normative theory deals <br /> explicitly with what ought to be - the way the <br /> world should be ordered and the value choices <br /> decision makers should make. </p><p> (Viotti, P. and M. Kauppi, (eds.). 1987. <br /> International Relations Theory. Macmillan <br /> Publishing Company, New York). </p>
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则

Archiver|小黑屋|中国海外利益研究网|政治学与国际关系论坛 ( 京ICP备12023743号  

GMT+8, 2025-7-16 11:18 , Processed in 0.093750 second(s), 27 queries .

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表