|
4#

楼主 |
发表于 2010-9-6 17:16:51
|
只看该作者
At Jackson Hole, policymakers debated whether further measures to stimulate demand were needed. History shows today’s problems could certainly materialise as a consequence of the failure to provide sufficient economic stimulus. In particular, a collapse in financial intermediation can reduce the availability of loans. This lack of access to credit, in turn, makes households and business less able to spend, lengthening and deepening the downturn. In such circumstances slow growth often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy produced by timid authorities, who neither supported spending nor dealt with the capital-adequacy problems at large banks.
在Jackson Hole,决策者们探讨了是否有必要进一步出台刺激需求的举措。历史表明,作为未能提供足够的经济刺激的结果,今日所说的这些问题确实可能会出现。特别的,金融中介的****会导致贷款供应减少。进而,告贷无门将降低家庭和企业的支出能力。这将延长并加剧经济低迷状况。在这种情况下,经济缓慢增长经常会变成胆小政府制造的一个“自我实现的预言”,这类政府既不会支持消费,也不会去解决大型银行的资本充足率问题。
However, it is also possible that economic contraction and a slow recovery can dent aggregate supply, otherwise known as an economy’s ability to produce efficiently. In this scenario, much less discussed in current debates, a sustained stretch of below-trend investment, alongside the depreciation of human capital that comes from high unemployment, hits the level and growth rate of potential output. That is, the unemployment rate stays high because it has been high.
然而,经济萎缩和缓慢复苏的形势也可能会削弱总供给,或称经济的有效生产能力。在这种情况下,(目前的辩论对此讨论较少)投资持续低于趋势水平的局面,再加上高失业率导致的人力贬值,将会影响潜在产出的水平和增长率。换句话说,失业率仍会高位运行,因为一直就处于高位。 |
|