1. Donald Kagan, “In Defense of History” (2005 Jefferson Lecture in the Humanities, Yale University, May 12, 2005)
2. John Lewis Gaddis, “History, Science, and the Study of International Relations,” in Ngaire Woods, ed., Explaining International Relations since 1945 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 32-47;
3. Leopold von Ranke, “The Great Powers,” in idem, The Theory and Practice of History, edited by Georg Iggers and Konrad von Moltke (Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc., 1973), pp. 65-101;
4. Ludwig Dehio, “The Passing of the European System,” in idem, Germany and World Politics in the Twentieth Century (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1959), pp. 124-133;
5. Paul Kennedy, “Mahan vs. Mackinder: Two Interpretations of the British Sea Power,” in Paul Kennedy, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1870-1945: Eight Studies (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1983), pp. 43-85;
6. John Lewis Gaddis, “The Long Peace: Elements of Stability in the Postwar International System，” in idem, The Long Peace: Inquiries into the History of the Cold War, (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 1987), pp. 215-245;
7. Martin Wight, “Why Is There No International Theory?” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigation (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966), pp. 17-34;
8. Steven Forde, “Varieties of Realism: Thucydides and Machiavelli,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 54, No. 2 (May 1992), pp. 372-393;
9. Hedley Bull, “The Grotian Conception of International Society,” in Herbert Butterfield and Martin Wight, eds., Diplomatic Investigations (Cambridge, Mass., 1966), pp. 51-73;
10. J.L. Brierly, “The Classical Writers on International Law,” in idem, The Law of Nations, 6th edition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963), pp. 25-40;
11. Michael W. Doyle, “Kant, Liberal Legacies, and Foreign Affairs, Part 2,” Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 12, No. 4 (Fall 1983)；
12. Hedley Bull, “International Theory: The Case for a Classical Approach,” World Politics, Vol. 18, No. 3 (April 1966), pp. 361-377;
13. J. David Singer, “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations,” in David J. Singer, Klaus Knorr and Sidney Verba, eds., The International System: Theoretical Essays (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1961);
14. K.J. Holsti, “Scholarship in an Era of Anxiety: The Study of International Politics during the Cold War,” in Tim Dunne, Michael Cox, and Ken Booth, eds., The Eighty Years Crisis: International Relations, 1919-1999 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998); pp. 17-46;
15. Hans J. Morgenthau, “Six Principles of Political Realism,” in idem The Politics Among Nations, 5th edition (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1972);
16. Robert Jervis, “Theories of War in an Era of Leading Power Peace,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 96, No. 1 (March 2002);
17. Alexander Wendt, “Anarchy Is What States Make of It,” International Organization, Vol. 46, No. 2 (Spring 1992);
18. Bruce R. Scott, “The Great Divide in the Global Village,” Foreign Affairs, Vol. 80, No. 1 (January/February 2001)；
19. Garrett Hardin, “The Tragedy of Commons,” Science, Vol. 162 (December 13, 1966)；
20. Rhoda E. Howard and Jack Donnelly, “Human Rights in World Politics,” in International Handbook of Human Rights (Westport, CT.: Greenwood Publishing, 1987).
1. Feriederich Meinecke, Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’Etat and Its Place in Modern History (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1957), chapter 1;
2. Ludwig Dehio, The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle (New York: Alfred. A. Knopf, 1962), pp. 3-15;
3. Harold Nicolson, The Evolution of Diplomacy (New York: Collier Books, 1954), Chapters 2-4;
4. Geoffrey Barraclough, An Introduction to Contemporary History (Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Limited, 1964), Chapters 3-6;
5. Kenneth N. Waltz, Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979), chapter 5;
6. Paul W. Schroeder, David Wetzel, Robert Jervis, and Jack S. Levy, eds., Systems, Stability, and statecraft: Essays on the International History of Modern Europe, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2004), Introduction;
7. Robert Gilpin, “The Nature of Political Economy,” in idem, U.S. Power and the Multinational Corporation: The Political Economy of Direct Foreign Investment (New York: Perseus Books Group, 1975);
8. Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Jr., Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, 3rd edition (New York: Longman, 2001), pp. 20-52;
9. Robert O. Keohan, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Economy (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1984), pp. 49-64.
二、原著
10. Ludwig Dehio, The Precarious Balance: Four Centuries of the European Power Struggle，translated by Charles Fullman (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1962)
11. Martin Wight, International Theory: Three Traditions, edited by Gabriele Wight and Brian Porter (New York: Holmes & Meiner, 1992)
12. Michael Doyle, Ways of War and Peace: Realism, Liberalism, and Socialism (New York: W.W. Norton, 1997)
13. Phil Williams et al. eds., Classic Readings of International Relations (Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth, 1999)
14. K.J. Holsti, International Politics: A Framework for Analysis, 7th edition (Englewood Cliffs., N.J.：Prentice-Hall, 1995)