政治学与国际关系论坛

标题: 谁在沉睡?汤马斯·弗里德曼 文 梁立峰 编译 [打印本页]

作者: nicholasxw    时间: 2010-12-10 19:24
标题: 谁在沉睡?汤马斯·弗里德曼 文 梁立峰 编译
  1997年香港回归后的第一任行政长官董建华前几天提供给我一个有关中国现代经济历史的三句话概要:“工业革命时期,中国在沉睡。信息技术革命时期,她刚刚苏醒。绿色革命时期,她要完全参与进来。”
  我想说,现在的中国让我从未如此深信过这样一个事实,即当史学家们回顾21世纪第一个十年的时候,他们都会说即将发生的最重要的事件不是大衰退,而是中国的绿色大跃进。中央领导层很清楚,E.T.---能源科技,技术革新不仅是必要的,而且也是一个机遇,政府不会错失良机。

  相比之下,我们却把目光都聚焦到阿富汗。祝一天愉快!
  好吧,这是个贱招。但是这个不是:英特尔创始人之一,安迪.格鲁夫总是喜欢说当企业遇到“战略转折点”时,在商业规则已改变的情况下,他们要么选择在下降循环中做出投资决定并找到更有希望的途径,或者什么也不做,干等着事业萎缩。同样,对于国家而言也是一样的。
  美国目前正处于战略转变时期。我们要么为碳排放买单,实行有效的调整以确保美国在能源技术革命中成为中国主要的竞争者或合作者,要么,我们慢慢的将这一工业让给中国,包括随之而来的好的工作机会和能源保障。
  奥巴马总统是否准备继续完成医改,而暂缓能源立法,包括为了在中期选举中获得成功就已在国会通过的碳排放定价,以避免共和党们对所谓“新税收”的挑战?或者,在中期选举前把握住这一时刻,这许是他能让众议院多数人包括一些共和党人在碳排放价格和为实现清洁能源革新和能源保障而实施的美国“引擎”的最后机会?
  中国在去年出现的风能,太阳能,公共交通和煤炭高效燃烧的项目数量让我非常惊讶。这里有一封来自eSolar--一家位于加利福尼亚从事太阳能-热能的企业执掌人--比尔.格罗斯的电子邮件:星期六在北京,他宣布了“一笔世界上最大的太阳能--热能交易。这将是一个耗资50亿美元,通过应用来自加利福尼亚的技术,产能将达到20亿瓦特的电站。在这方面,中国比美国更积极主动。我们为在新墨西哥的一个9千2百万的的项目向美国能源部提交了申请,当该项目尚处于申请审核的第一阶段的时候,中国已在更短的时间里签署,批准,并准备今年开始建设这个20倍大的项目。”
  的确,中国政府关注着气候变化,但是他们更加知道这个国家正处于人类历史上最大的从农村到城市的人口迁移。这就产生了巨大的能源需求。中国政府决定通过发展更清洁的,本土生产的能源来加以应对。这也能使将来的经济更少的受到打击;也免于自己死于污染。根据《时代周刊》驻中国的主编凯斯.布雷沙的报道,
  仅去年一年,中国就涌现了许多新的太阳能电池板生产商,这使得太阳能的价格从大约59美分每千瓦时降至16美分。与此同时,中国在上周测试了从武汉到广州的告诉铁路。这是迄今为止世界上最快的高铁,时速达到217英里。正如布雷沙报道的,“中国将很快完成从北京到上海,总耗资达235亿美元的高速铁路网的建设。700英里的里程将由现在的12小时缩短为5小时。相比之下,从纽约到芝加哥,在差不多的距离下,美铁要用18个小时才能通过全程。”
  中国也是世界上核能发展最迅速的国家。到2020年,中国将拟建50座新的核反应堆;而全球其他国家总建设数量为15座。香港最大的能源设备供应商---中电集团的主席包立贤(AndrewBrandler)说:“在本个十年末,中国将成为能源成套设备的主要生产国。”在此过程中,中国将不仅为自己而且也为其他国家提供更经济的清洁能源技术。但是,中国这一领域的专家们也表示,如果中美能在中国仍处于薄弱阶段的能源研发与革新和新的清洁能源技术的风险投资与服务,及规模化生产上进行合作,这一目标将能更快而有效的实现。
  这是一个战略调整点。显然,如果我们美国关心我们的能源保障,经济力量和环境质量,我们需要实行一个长期的碳排放价格体制以便更加激励清洁能源的革新。我们不能在中国已完全苏醒过来时自己却开始沉睡。

英文原文:


January 10, 2010
OP-ED COLUMNIST
Who's Sleeping Now?
By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
Hong Kong
C. H. Tung, the first Chinese-appointed chief executive of Hong Kong after the handover in 1997, offered me a three-sentence summary the other day of China's modern economic history: "China was asleep during the Industrial Revolution. She was just waking during the Information Technology Revolution. She intends to participate fully in the Green Revolution."
I'll say. Being in China right now I am more convinced than ever that when historians look back at the end of the first decade of the 21st century, they will say that the most important thing to happen was not the Great Recession, but China's Green Leap Forward. The Beijing leadership clearly understands that the E.T. - Energy Technology - revolution is both a necessity and an opportunity, and they do not intend to miss it.
We, by contrast, intend to fix Afghanistan. Have a nice day.
O.K., that was a cheap shot. But here's one that isn't: Andy Grove, co-founder of Intel, liked to say that companies come to "strategic inflection points," where the fundamentals of a business change and they either make the hard decision to invest in a down cycle and take a more promising trajectory or do nothing and wither. The same is true for countries.
The U.S. is at just such a strategic inflection point. We are either going to put in place a price on carbon and the right regulatory incentives to ensure that America is China's main competitor/partner in the E.T. revolution, or we are going to gradually cede this industry to Beijing and the good jobs and energy security that would go with it.
Is President Obama going to finish health care and then put aside the pending energy legislation - and carbon pricing - that Congress has already passed in order to get through the midterms without Republicans screaming "new taxes?" Or is he going to seize this moment before the midterms - possibly his last window to put together a majority in the Senate, including some Republicans, for a price on carbon - and put in place a real U.S. engine for clean energy innovation and energy security?
I've been stunned to learn about the sheer volume of wind, solar, mass transit, nuclear and more efficient coal-burning projects that have sprouted in China in just the last year.
Here's e-mail from Bill Gross, who runs eSolar, a promising California solar-thermal start-up: On Saturday, in Beijing, said Gross, he announced "the biggest solar-thermal deal ever. It's a 2 gigawatt, $5 billion deal to build plants in China using our California-based technology. China is being even more aggressive than the U.S. We applied for a [U.S. Department of Energy] loan for a 92 megawatt project in New Mexico, and in less time than it took them to do stage 1 of the application review, China signs, approves, and is ready to begin construction this year on a 20 times bigger project!"
Yes, climate change is a concern for Beijing, but more immediately China's leaders know that their country is in the midst of the biggest migration of people from the countryside to urban centers in the history of mankind. This is creating a surge in energy demand, which China is determined to meet with cleaner, homegrown sources so that its future economy will be less vulnerable to supply shocks and so it doesn't pollute itself to death.
In the last year alone, so many new solar panel makers emerged in China that the price of solar power has fallen from roughly 59 cents a kilowatt hour to 16 cents, according to The Times's bureau chief here, Keith Bradsher. Meanwhile, China last week tested the fastest bullet train in the world - 217 miles per hour - from Wuhan to Guangzhou. As Bradsher noted, China "has nearly finished the construction of a high-speed rail route from Beijing to Shanghai at a cost of $23.5 billion. Trains will cover the 700-mile route in just five hours, compared with 12 hours today. By comparison, Amtrak trains require at least 18 hours to travel a similar distance from New York to Chicago."
China is also engaged in the world's most rapid expansion of nuclear power. It is expected to build some 50 new nuclear reactors by 2020; the rest of the world combined might build 15.
"By the end of this decade, China will be dominating global production of the whole range of power equipment," said Andrew Brandler, the C.E.O. of the CLP Group, Hong Kong's largest power utility.
In the process, China is going to make clean power technologies cheaper for itself and everyone else. But even Chinese experts will tell you that it will all happen faster and more effectively if China and America work together - with the U.S. specializing in energy research and innovation, at which China is still weak, as well as in venture investing and servicing of new clean technologies, and with China specializing in mass production.
This is a strategic inflection point. It is clear that if we, America, care about our energy security, economic strength and environmental quality we need to put in place a long-term carbon price that stimulates and rewards clean power innovation. We can't afford to be asleep with an invigorated China wide awake.




欢迎光临 政治学与国际关系论坛 (http://bbs.newslist.com.cn/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2