[ 1 ] 亨利·基辛格:《大外交》,海口:海南出版社1998年版,第3页; Stanley Hoffman, Primacy or World Order: American Foreign Policy since the Cold War, New York: McGraw Hill Book Company, 1978, p. 2.
[ 2 ] G. John Ikenberry, After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of O rder after Major War, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001, p. 4.
[ 3 ] G. John Ikenberry, “The End of the Neo – Conservative Moment, ”Survival, Vol. 46, No. 1, Sp ring 2004, pp. 7 - 22.
[ 12 ] Inis L. Claude, J r. , Swords Into Plowshares: The Problem s and Progress of International Organization, New York: McGraw - Hill, 1984, p. 262.
[ 13 ] 朱建民:《国际组织新论》,第558页。
[ 14 ] 基辛格:《大外交》,第36页。
[ 15 ] Fredrick S. Calhown, Power and Principle: Armed International in Wilsonian Foreign Policy, Kent: The Kent State University Press, 1986, p. 23.
[ 16 ] 邓蜀生:《威尔逊》,上海人民出版社1982年,第220页。
[ 17 ] Robert Gilp in, “The Rise of American Hegemony, ”in Patrick Karl O ’Brien and Armand Clesse, eds. , Two Hegemonies: Britain 1846 - 1914 and the United States 1941 - 2001, Burlington: Ashgate Publishing
Company, 2002, p. 168.
[ 19 ] 罗伯特·基欧汉也不无遗憾地指出,“富兰克林·罗斯福对安全秩序的设计在当时争论剧烈,实际上人们至今对它的理解仍然是不足的。”参见Robert O. Keohane, “Associative American Development,1776 - 1860”, in John Ruggie, ed. , The Antinomies of Interdependence: N ationalW elfare and the International Division of Labor, New York: Columbia University Press, 1983, p. 90.
[ 21 ] Robert D. Hormats, “The Roots of American Power, ”Foreign Affairs, Vol. 70, No. 3, Summer 1991, pp. 132 - 149.
[ 22 ] 潘忠岐:《世界秩序:结构、机制与模式》,上海人民出版社, 2004年版,第30页。
[ 23 ] 兹·布热津斯基:《大抉择:美国站在十字路口》,新华出版社2005年版,第149页。
[ 24 ] 兹·布热津斯基:《大抉择:美国站在十字路口》,第149页。
[ 25 ] 郑端耀:“布希政府安全战略评析”,载《远景季刊》2003年第4卷第2期,第1 - 36页; G. John Ikenberry, “America’s Imperial Ambition, ”Foreign Affairs, Vol. 81, No. 5, Sep t. / Oct. , 2002, pp. 44 - 60.
[ 26 ] G. John Ikenberry, “The End of the Neo – Conservative Moment, ”Survival, Vol. 46, No. 1, Sp ring 2004, pp. 7 - 22.
[ 27 ] G. John Ikenberry, “Liberalism and Empire: Logics of Order in the American Unipolar Age, ”Review of International Studies, Vol. 30, 2004, pp. 609 - 630.
[ 28 ] Richard Copper, The Postmodern State and the World Order, London: Demos, 2000; Martin Walker, “America’s Virtual Empire, ”World Policy Journal, Vol. 19, No. 2, Summer 2002, pp. 13 - 20.
[ 29 ] G. John Ikenberry, “American Power and the Empire of Capitalist Democracy, ”Review of International Studies, Vol. 27, 2001, pp. 191 - 212.
[ 30 ] RobertO. Keohane, “Hobbes’s Dilemma and Institutional Change in World Politics: Sovereignty in International Society”, pp. 165 - 186.
[ 33 ] Richard N. Haass, “What to Do with American Primacy, ”Foreign Affairs, Vol. 78, No. 5, Sep t. /October, 1999, pp. 37 - 47.
[ 34 ] Edward Luck, M ixed M essages: Am erican Politics and International Organization, 1919 - 1999, Washington: Brooking Institution Press, 1999, p. 284.