[9]古奈尔和米兰·布格列茨都曾详细讨论过这一话题。参见John G. Gunnell. The orders of Discourse: Philosophy, Social Science, and Politics(London: Routledge,1998);Milan Brglez, “Reconsidering Wendt’s Meta-theory: Blending Scientific Realism with Social Constructivism,” Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 4, No.4( December ,2001),p. 342.
[17]这类似于阿尔蒙德所指出的社会科学被分为的“方法论”和“意识形态”两个领域。他指出,运用科学方法使学科专业化大大增强,美国学科迅速传播到其他国家的同时,也由于过分强调数字、模型却使得社会科学分成两个研究领域:方法论和意识形态。参见Gabriel A. Almond, A Discipline Divided:Schools and Sects in Political Science( London:Sage Publication,1990),pp.14-15.
[7] Tim Dunn. Inventing International Society [M]. London: MacmillanPress,1998.
[8] Gabriel A. Almond. A Discipline Divided: Schools and Sects in Political Science [M]. London: Sage Publication,1990.
[9] 谭再文.“国际关系理论”辫识[J].国际观察,2002,(5).
[10] Andrew Hurrell. Keeping History, Law and Political Philosophy Firmly within the English School[J]. Review of International Studies, Vol .27,No.3(July ,2001).
[11] 阎学通.国际关系理论是普世性的[J].世界经济与政治,2006,(2).
[12] 鲁鹏.创建中国国际关系理论四种途径的分析与评价[J].世界经济与政治,2006,(6).
[13][法]雷蒙·阿隆.社会学主要思潮[M].葛智强等译,上海:上海译文出版社,1987.
[14] James A. Gregor. Political Science and the uses of Functional Analysis [J]. The American Political Science Review, Vol. 62, No. 2 (Jun., 1968).
[15] Karl Deutsch. The Analysis of International Relations[M]. Upper Saddle River:Prentice Hall, Inc, 1978.
[20] David Easton & Corinne S. Schelling. Divided knowledge: Across Disciplines, Across Cultures, Sage Publications, 1991.
[21] [德]马克斯·韦伯.社会科学方法论[M].北京:华夏出版社,1999.
[22]王逸舟.试析中国国际关系学的“进步”:几点批评与思考[J].外交评论,2006,(3).
[23] 苏国勋.理性化及其限制—韦伯思想引论[M].上海:上海人民出版社,1988.
[24] Scott Gordon. Social Science and Value Judgments[J]. The Canadian Journal of Economics Vol.10,No.4,1977.
[25] 石斌.国际关系理论“中国式探索”的几个基本问题[J].世界经济与政治,2004,(5).
[26] Robert Cox.Social Forces, States and World Order: Beyond International Relations Theory[A].Robert Keohane ed, Neorealism and Its Critics[C] .Columbia University Press, 1986.